Legal Opinion

State v. Medina

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided February 7, 2017No. AC38932PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSullivan, J.

The defendant, Jose E. Medina, appeals from the judgment of conviction, rendered after a jury trial, of capital felony in violation of General Statutes (Rev. 2011) § 53a-54b (7) 1 and General Statutes § 53a-8 (a), and conspiracy to commit murder in violation of General Statutes §§ 53a-48 (a) and 53a-54a (a). On appeal, the defendant claims that the trial court improperly allowed the jury to consider inculpatory statements in violation of his federal constitutional rights where the record is clear that either (1) the detectives failed to advise the defendant of his Miranda rights 2 prior to…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. State v. GoldingSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
  3. State v. EdmondsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2016
  4. State v. PolancoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2016
  5. State v. PolancoConnecticut Appellate Court · 2016

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. HargettConnecticut Appellate Court · 2020
  2. State v. DunbarConnecticut Appellate Court · 2019
  3. State v. McCleeseSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2019
  4. Medina v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2026
  5. State v. MedinaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API