Legal Opinion

State v. Polanco

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided May 17, 2016No. AC36502PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDiPENTIMA, C.J.

*564 The defendant, Shiloh Polanco, appeals from the judgment of the trial court revoking his probation and imposing a thirty month prison sentence. On appeal, the defendant claims that he was denied his right to due process under the fourteenth *565 amendment to the United States constitution 1 by the court's admission into evidence of a laboratory report when the author of that report was not present and available for cross-examination. We conclude that this claim was not preserved and that the record is inadequate to review it under State v. Golding, 213 Conn. 233 , 239-40, 567 A.2d 823 (1989).…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Gagnon v. ScarpelliSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. State v. GoldingSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
  5. Melendez-Diaz v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 2009

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. PolancoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2016
  2. State v. ChemlenConnecticut Appellate Court · 2016
  3. State v. EsquilinConnecticut Appellate Court · 2018
  4. State v. TuckerConnecticut Appellate Court · 2018
  5. State v. CunninghamConnecticut Appellate Court · 2016

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API