Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Albany Urology Clinic, P.C. v. Cleveland

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided March 6, 2000No. S99G0600Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partCarley, Justice

I concur in the majority’s holding that the judgment cannot rest upon the theory that Dr. Trulock’s non-disclosure of his cocaine use is actionable as an independent tort of fraud. I do not, however, agree with the majority’s conclusion that a recovery cannot be based upon the alternative theory that Dr. Trulock committed a battery against Mr. Cleveland.

Medical negligence is not the only possible tort which can arise from the doctor-patient relationship. To avoid civil liability for a battery, a physician has the duty to obtain his patient’s consent to undergo treatment. OCGA §§ 51-1-13;…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Hunter, MacLean, Exley & Dunn, P.C. v. FrameSupreme Court of Georgia · 1998
  2. Morris v. JohnstoneSupreme Court of Georgia · 1931
  3. Mims v. BolandCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1964
  4. Irwin v. ArrendaleCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1967
  5. Keenan v. PlouffeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1997

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API