Keenan v. Plouffe
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Sears, Justice.
One of the many issues raised by this appeal is whether a state-employed physician who is alleged to have negligently performed surgery on a private-pay patient is immune from suit under the State Tort Claims Act. The trial court granted summary judgment to the appellee-physician, Dr. Leo Plouffe, based upon official immunity. We conclude that Dr. Plouffe is not immune from suit because he is sought to be held liable only for the exercise of his medical (as opposed to governmental) discretion in treating his patient, and because the purposes of official immunity, as set forth…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Kassen v. HatleyTexas Supreme Court · 1994
- Gilbert v. RichardsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1994
- James v. JaneSupreme Court of Virginia · 1980
- Messina v. BurdenSupreme Court of Virginia · 1984
- Hennessy v. WebbSupreme Court of Georgia · 1980
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- Ex Parte CranmanSupreme Court of Alabama · 2000
- Miller v. MeeksMississippi Supreme Court · 2000
- Martinez v. MaruszczakNevada Supreme Court · 2007
- Shekhawat v. JonesSupreme Court of Georgia · 2013
- Cantrell v. ThurmanCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1998
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.