Legal Opinion

Keenan v. Plouffe

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided March 3, 1997No. S96A1349PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Sears, Justice.

One of the many issues raised by this appeal is whether a state-employed physician who is alleged to have negligently performed surgery on a private-pay patient is immune from suit under the State Tort Claims Act. The trial court granted summary judgment to the appellee-physician, Dr. Leo Plouffe, based upon official immunity. We conclude that Dr. Plouffe is not immune from suit because he is sought to be held liable only for the exercise of his medical (as opposed to governmental) discretion in treating his patient, and because the purposes of official immunity, as set forth…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Kassen v. HatleyTexas Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Gilbert v. RichardsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1994
  3. James v. JaneSupreme Court of Virginia · 1980
  4. Messina v. BurdenSupreme Court of Virginia · 1984
  5. Hennessy v. WebbSupreme Court of Georgia · 1980

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Ex Parte CranmanSupreme Court of Alabama · 2000
  2. Miller v. MeeksMississippi Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Martinez v. MaruszczakNevada Supreme Court · 2007
  4. Shekhawat v. JonesSupreme Court of Georgia · 2013
  5. Cantrell v. ThurmanCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1998

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API