Legal Opinion

Domínguez v. Nadal del Moral

Supreme Court of Puerto Rico

Decided September 29, 1934No. 6042Published

1Opinion of the Court

Me. Justice Cókdova Dávila

delivered tlie opinion of the Court.

The plaintiff has once again moved for a reconsideration of our judgment in the above entitled case: It is insistently urged that Francisco .del Moral could not represent Carmen Nadal, the incapacitated person, in the foreclosure proceedings brought by the said Carmen Nadal through del Moral, who was then acting as her guardianj against José A. Dominguez, the plaintiff herein. The above is advanced as a ground of nullity. The opinion delivered by us in which the question raised was determined reads as follows:

“Francisco del Moral…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. In re Estates of BeiselCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  2. In re Cameron's EstateMichigan Supreme Court · 1909
  3. Zeideman v. MolaskyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1906
  4. Taylor v. the Superior CourtSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1910
  5. Taylor v. the Superior CourtSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1909

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API