Legal Opinion

Cawsey v. Brickey

Washington Supreme Court

Decided December 17, 1914No. 12310PublishedCited by 37 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Skagit county, Houser, J., entered June 17, 1914, upon findings in favor of the defendants, dismissing an action for an injunction.

1Opinion of the CourtEllis, J.

Action to enjoin the enforcement of an order creating a game preserve in Skagit county. The plaintiffs constitute a gun club, and have leased, for a term of years, certain lands as a shooting preserve, including lands of the interveners, and have, for a long time, maintained thereon a gun club and have expended considerable sums in equipment. The defendants are the sheriff, prosecuting attorney, game warden and the three members of the game commission, of Skagit county, appointed under the game code, chapter 120, Laws of 1913, p. 356 et seq. (3 Rem. & Bal. Code, *655§ 5395-1 et seq.). Acting…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Field v. ClarkSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  2. Geer v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  3. Ex parte MaierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
  4. Dowling v. Lancashire InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1896
  5. Harper v. GallowaySupreme Court of Florida · 1909

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. State v. MierzWashington Supreme Court · 1995
  2. State Ex Rel. Bacich v. HuseWashington Supreme Court · 1936
  3. Vail v. SeaborgWashington Supreme Court · 1922
  4. Holzman v. City of SpokaneWashington Supreme Court · 1916
  5. State Ex Rel. Campbell v. CaseWashington Supreme Court · 1935

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API