Legal Opinion

Estate of Brooks

California Supreme Court

Decided October 24, 1931No. Docket No. S.F. 14083PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THE COURT.

A hearing was granted in this case after decision by the District Court of Appeal, First Appellate District, Division Two. Upon further consideration we are satisfied with the disposition of the cause made by said court, and we hereby adopt the opinion of Mr. Justice Sturtevant as the opinion of this court. It reads as follows:

“The public administrator of San Francisco filed a petition asking that a purported will be admitted to probate and that he be appointed administrator with the will annexed. After due notice certain heirs appeared and filed a written opposition. To that…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. See v. North American Accident InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
  2. Ryder v. BambergerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
  3. In Re the Estate of ManchesterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
  4. Estate of BernardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
  5. In Re the Estate of McMahonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Estate of MoodyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
  2. Goldberg v. BlochCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
  3. Kinney v. GardellaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
  4. Charles H. Cook Bible School v. CollierArizona Supreme Court · 1933
  5. Estate of GardenerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API