Legal Opinion

Corey v. Roberts

Utah Supreme Court

Decided October 10, 1933No. 5057PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MOFFAT, Justice.

The plaintiff is the appellant and the defendant is the respondent. In briefs and arguments the parties have been so designated and for convenience will herein be so referred to. For a long time prior to the 14th day of January, 1918, the plaintiff was the owner and in possession of certain property located on the east side of Washington avenue between Twenty-Fifth and Twenty-Sixth streets, in Ogden City, Utah. At that time the plaintiff was indebted to the New York Life Insurance Company in the principal sum of $28,000 and certain accrued interest. This indebtedness was…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Peugh v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  2. Clark v. ClarkUtah Supreme Court · 1929
  3. Singleton v. KellyUtah Supreme Court · 1922
  4. Lawley v. HickenlooperUtah Supreme Court · 1922
  5. Duerden v. SolomonUtah Supreme Court · 1908

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Northcrest, Inc. v. WALKER BANK & TRUST CO.Utah Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Blue River Sawmills, Ltd. v. GatesOregon Supreme Court · 1960
  3. Kesler Ex Rel. Kesler v. RogersUtah Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Haws v. JensenUtah Supreme Court · 1949
  5. Hansen v. KohlerUtah Supreme Court · 1976

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API