Legal Opinion

Merkel v. Federal Express Corp.

District Court, N.D. Mississippi

Decided May 1, 1995No. Civ. A. 2:93cv161-D-APublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

DAVIDSON, District Judge.

Upon consideration of this matter, sua sponte, the court finds that it possesses no subject matter jurisdiction over the case at bar. Removal in this cause was improvident, and this matter shall be remanded to the County Court of Coahoma County, Mississippi.

FACTUAL SUMMARY

The plaintiff Charles Merkel is an attorney in Clarksdale, Mississippi, and is an avid baseball card collector. In September of 1992, the plaintiff was considering the purchase of a set of 1960 Topps baseball cards from the Brigandi Coin Company (“Brigandi”), in New York, N.Y.…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Caterpillar Inc. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  2. Franchise Tax Bd. of Cal. v. Construction Laborers Vacation Trust for Southern Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Metropolitan Life Insurance v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  4. Morales v. Trans World Airlines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
  5. Avco Corp. v. Aero Lodge No. 735, International Ass'n of MacHinists & Aerospace WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1968

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Mayor of Balt. v. BP P. L.C.District Court, D. Maryland · 2019
  2. Wright v. Combined Insurance Co. of AmericaDistrict Court, N.D. Mississippi · 1997
  3. Jenkins v. Sandoz Pharmaceuticals Corp.District Court, N.D. Mississippi · 1997
  4. Sherron v. Private Issue by DiscoverDistrict Court, N.D. Mississippi · 1997
  5. Roberts Distributor, Inc. v. Federal Express Corp.District Court, S.D. Indiana · 1996

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API