Legal Opinion

Viemeister v. Bd. of Education of Prospect Park

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided October 18, 1949PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This is an appeal from a decision of the State Board of Education which affirmed the action of the Commissioner of Education in directing the appellant Board of Education to reinstate respondent Edmund H. Viemeister as principal in the school district of Prospect Park.

The respondent was employed as principal in 1937 and thereafter duly acquired tenure within the contemplation of R.S. 18:13-16. The respondent performed no teaching duties. There were seventeen teachers employed including Miss Amelia Berdan, an eighth grade teacher under tenure, who, in addition to her teaching duties, acted as…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Seidel v. Board of Education of Ventnor CitySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1933
  2. Downs v. Board of EducationSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1935
  3. Sutherland v. Board of Street & Water CommissionersSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1898

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Spiewak v. Rutherford Bd. of Ed.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1982
  2. Dennery v. Board of EducationSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1993
  3. Clark v. BeverlySupreme Court of Alabama · 1952
  4. BD. OF ED. OF MANCHESTER TP. v. RaubingerNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1963
  5. Capodilupo v. W. Orange Tp. Ed. Bd.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1987

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API