Legal Opinion

Sutherland v. Board of Street & Water Commissioners

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided February 15, 1898PublishedCited by 4 opinions

On rule for mandamus.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Dixon, J.

Prior to May 12th, 1897, the relator was-assistant assessment clerk in the office of the board of street and water commissioners of Jersey City. His position was under the control of that board, and on the day named tlier board passed the following resolution:

*437Resolved, that for the purpose of economizing in the salary list in the bureau of engineering and survey, the position designated and known as assistant assessment clerk be and is hereby permanently abolished, and the duties thereof transferred to and required to be performed by the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State v. Board of Chosen FreeholdersSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1891

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Garvey v. City of LowellMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1908
  2. Viemeister v. Bd. of Education of Prospect ParkNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1949
  3. McCartney v. FrancoNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1965
  4. Stone v. Old Bridge Tp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API