Legal Opinion

Seidel v. Board of Education of Ventnor City

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided January 20, 1933PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Parker, J.

Prosecutrix challenges the legal propriety of her dismissal as a public school teacher in Ventnor City, on the ground of three years’ service and the resulting status of indefinite tenure. Pamph. L. 1909, p. 398; Comp. Stat., p. 4763. The answer made is that the board of education abolished her position in the interest of econ'omy. She replies that the abolition was no more than the reduction by one teacher of the teaching force in the public school, and that she was entitled to remain as teacher in preference to others who had not come under…

2Cited by16 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Ging v. Board of EducationSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1942
  2. Viemeister v. Bd. of Education of Prospect ParkNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1949
  3. Pickens County Board of Education v. KeaslerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1955
  4. Matthews v. Bd. of Ed. of IrvingtonNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1954
  5. Quinlan v. Bd. of Ed. of North Bergen Tp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1962

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API