Legal Opinion

Richard H. Underwood v. Hammond C. Woods, Robert I. Adelman, Chester B. Kaplan and G. M. Osgood

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided February 10, 1969No. 18832_1PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BLACKMUN, Circuit Judge.

On March 15, 1966, Richard H. Underwood filed his diversity complaint pro se against his former attorneys, Hammond C. WoodSj Robert I. Adelman, and Chester B. Kaplan, and against G. M. Osgood, a physician-internist. He sought damages from Woods and Adelman for negligence in defending him on a Missouri charge for felonious assault, and for slander; from Kaplan for failure to advise and for failure to sue Woods and Adelman; and from Doctor Osgood for libel and for negligence and, seemingly, malpractice.

Plaintiff Underwood, who is not a lawyer, tried the case himself. He…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Pulliam v. BondSupreme Court of Missouri · 1966
  2. Hellesen v. Knaus Truck Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1963
  3. Martin v. PotashnickSupreme Court of Missouri · 1949
  4. National Credit Associates, Inc. v. TinkerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1966
  5. Mary E. Lewis v. John D. NelsonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1960

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Alfonso J. Cervantes v. Time, Inc., and Denny WalshCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1972
  2. Lange v. MarshallMissouri Court of Appeals · 1981
  3. Rhiver v. RietmanIndiana Court of Appeals · 1970
  4. Kuehne v. HoganMissouri Court of Appeals · 2010
  5. Kuehne v. HoganMissouri Court of Appeals · 2010

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API