Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Kuehne v. Hogan

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided June 8, 2010No. WD 71130Published

1ConcurrenceJoseph M. Ellis, Judge

I concur in the result reached by the majority, namely, affirming the trial court’s dismissal of Kuehne’s petition with prejudice. I am troubled, however, by the majority’s adoption of an actual innocence standard for malpractice cases brought by criminal defendants.1 The effect is to carve out what I perceive to be an unnecessary exception to long and well-settled tort law relating to professional negligence by attorneys and to create the potential for absurd results. It is my view that there is no need for such an exception because public defenders, such as Susan Hogan in this case, are…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Tower v. GloverSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Ferri v. AckermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Southers v. City of FarmingtonSupreme Court of Missouri · 2008
  4. State Ex Rel. Twiehaus v. AdolfSupreme Court of Missouri · 1986
  5. Browne v. RobbSupreme Court of Delaware · 1990

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API