Legal Opinion
Deshaun Johnson v. TomoCredit, Inc.
District Court, N.D. California
Decided July 7, 2026No. 4:25-cv-11018Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 DESHAUN JOHNSON, Case No. 26-cv-01172-HSG 8 Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING MOTION TO COMPEL ARBITRATION 9 v. Re: Dkt. No. 27 10 TOMOCREDIT, INC., 11 Defendant. 12 13 Pending before the Court is Defendant’s motion to compel arbitration. Dkt. No. 27-1 14 (“Mot.”); Dkt. No. 29 (“Opp.”); Dkt. No. 31 (“Reply”). The Court finds this matter appropriate 15 for disposition without oral argument and the matter is deemed submitted. See Civil L.R. 7-1(b). 16 For the reasons discussed below, the Court DENIES the motion. 17 I. BACKGROUND…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Henry Schein, Inc. v. Archer & White Sales, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2019
- Carey Brennan v. Opus BankCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
- Daniel Berman v. Freedom Financial Network LLCCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2022
- Lifescan, Inc. v. Premier Diabetic Services, Inc., a Florida CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- Oracle America, Inc. v. Myriad Group A.G.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.