Legal Opinion

Fong v. U.S. Bancorp

District Court, E.D. California

Decided March 6, 2025No. 2:22-cv-01291Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 PETER FONG, et al., No. 2:22-cv-01291-DC-CSK 12 Plaintiffs, 13 v. ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS’ RENEWED MOTION TO COMPEL 14 U.S. BANCORP, et al., ARBITRATION AND DENYING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION TO STRIKE AS 15 Defendants. MOOT 16 (Doc. Nos. 39, 40) 17 18 This matter came before the court on February 21, 2025 for a hearing on Defendants’ 19 renewed motion to compel arbitration and Plaintiffs’ motion to strike. (Doc. Nos. 39, 40.) 20 Attorney J. Toji Calabro appeared on behalf of Plaintiffs. Attorneys Michael…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Smith v. SpizzirriSupreme Court of the United States · 2024
  2. Shaw v. Regents of University of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997
  3. Hoffman v. TonnemacherCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
  4. United States v. Yair HoltzmanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
  5. Hung Hy Nguyen Dba Mekong Market v. United States of America, Raymond Bertrand Dba Ray's Groceries v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API