Legal Opinion
Keil Lock Co. v. Earle Hardware Manufacturing Co.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided August 27, 1954PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WALSH, District Judge.
In this action for damages for patent infringement, one of the defendants, Earle Hardware Manufacturing Company, moves to quash service of process and to dismiss the complaint as to it for lack of jurisdiction. The answer to the complaint contained defenses on the merits, a counterclaim, and, for Earle Hardware only, the defense of lack of jurisdiction over the person.
Earle Hardware is a Pennsylvania corporation. Upon oral argument plaintiff’s attorney conceded that Earle Hardware was not properly served and could not be served in this district because it does not…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Blank v. BitkerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1943
- Schlaefer v. SchlaeferCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1940
- Gerber v. FruchterCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1945
- Hook & Ackerman, Inc. v. HirshDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1951
- Sadler v. Pennsylvania Refining Co.District Court, W.D. South Carolina · 1940
3Cited by14 opinions
- David Neifeld v. Meyer Steinberg. David Neifeld v. Meyer SteinbergCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1971
- North Branch Products, Inc., a Michigan Corporation, of Millington, Michigan v. W. Reuen Fisher, Village of Entrance, Alberta, CanadaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1960
- In re the Arbitration between Intercarbon Bermuda, Ltd. & Caltex Trading & Transport Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1993
- Seymour M. Chase v. Pan-Pacific Broadcasting, Inc. Miko Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1984
- NationsBank, N.A. v. MacOil, Inc. (In Re Med-Atlantic Petroleum Corp.)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 1999
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.