Legal Opinion
Hook & Ackerman, Inc. v. Hirsh
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided March 22, 1951No. Civ. 3615-50PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CHARLES F. McLAUGHLIN, District Judge.
Plaintiff Hook & Ackerman, Inc., has brought this action based upon alleged damage to its business due to unfair competition and patent infringement on the part of the defendants, Hirsh and Pom-ponio doing business as the A & H Plumbing Supply Co., and W. S. Allen doing business as the Allen Equipment Company. Plaintiff has impleaded C. Howard Hook and W. W. Miller individually and doing business under the name of Hook and Miller Co., and John A. McCrance and Harold S. Ackerman as involuntary plaintiffs on the ground that said involuntary plaintiffs have…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Hook v. Hook & Ackerman, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1951
3Cited by13 opinions
- David Neifeld v. Meyer Steinberg. David Neifeld v. Meyer SteinbergCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1971
- North Branch Products, Inc., a Michigan Corporation, of Millington, Michigan v. W. Reuen Fisher, Village of Entrance, Alberta, CanadaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1960
- Robert Eikel and J. E. Davey v. States Marine Lines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1973
- Anderson v. Mikel Drilling Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1960
- Don A. Hasse, Administrator of the Estate of Frances Hasse, Deceased v. American Photograph Corporation, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1962
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.