Snohomish County v. Shorelines Hearings Board
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the CourtAppelwick, J.
The Shorelines Hearings Board (SHB) did not err in ruling that service of a copy of a shoreline permit appeal on Snohomish County’s (County) Planning Department complied with the requirement to serve the “local government” under the Shorelines Management Act, RCW 90.58.180. The requirements of RCW 4.28.080, which requires that service of a summons on a county in a judicial action be made on the county auditor, have not been incorporated into either RCW 90.58.180 or the Washington Administrative Procedure Act, chapter 34.05 RCW. We therefore hold that the SHB’s ruling was not in error.
FACTS
Snoh…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited14 opinions
- People Ex Rel. Wallace v. LabrenzIllinois Supreme Court · 1952
- Sorenson v. City of BellinghamWashington Supreme Court · 1972
- Bridle Trails Community Club v. City of BellevueCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1986
- Saldin Securities, Inc. v. Snohomish CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1998
- Saldin Securities, Inc. v. Snohomish CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1998
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Devine v. Department of LicensingCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2005
- Devine v. STATE, DEPT. OF LICENSINGCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2005
- Stafne v. Snohomish CountyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2010
- Stafne v. Snohomish CountyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2010
- Snohomish County v. SHBCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2001