Legal Opinion
Snohomish County v. SHB
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided October 15, 2001No. 47346-8-IPublished
1Opinion of the Court
32 P.3d 1034 (2001)
SNOHOMISH COUNTY, Appellant,
v.
STATE OF WASHINGTON SHORELINES HEARINGS BOARD, Respondent.
No. 47346-8-I.
Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 1.
October 15, 2001.
Ruth A. Robinson, Sonohomish County Prosecuting Attorney, for Appellant.
Jean Marie Wilkinson, Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.
APPELWICK, J.
The Shorelines Hearings Board (SHB) did not err in ruling that service of a copy of a shoreline permit appeal on Snohomish County's (County) Planning Department complied with the requirement to serve the "local government" under the Shorelines Management Act, RCW…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- People Ex Rel. Wallace v. LabrenzIllinois Supreme Court · 1952
- Sorenson v. City of BellinghamWashington Supreme Court · 1972
- Bridle Trails Community Club v. City of BellevueCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1986
- Saldin Securities, Inc. v. Snohomish CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1998
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.