Legal Opinion
Jeremy Witt v. Patrick Ross, et al.
District Court, N.D. California
Decided April 6, 2026No. 5:25-cv-02776Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 4 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 5 SAN JOSE DIVISION 6 7 JEREMY WITT, Case No. 5:25-cv-02776-BLF 8 Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S 9 v. MOTION TO DISMISS AND GRANTING DEFENDANT’S SPECIAL 10 PATRICK ROSS, et al., MOTION TO STRIKE SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT 11 Defendants. [Re: ECF Nos. 88, 120] 12 13 Before the Court is Defendant Patrick Ross’s special motion to strike pro se Plaintiff 14 Jeremy Witt’s second amended complaint, ECF No. 79 (“SAC”), pursuant to California Code of 15 Civil Procedure Section 425.16 (“anti–SLAPP statute”)1 or, in the…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Navellier v. SlettenCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
- White v. LeeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Briggs v. Eden Council for Hope & OpportunityCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
- William St. Clair John Shelton v. City of Chico County of ButteCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.