Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Frisino

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided January 31, 1986PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.

On appeal from his conviction of breaking and entering, the defendant claims that his trial counsel was ineffective. Our examination of the record shows that the performance of the defendant’s trial counsel fell “measurably below that which might be expected from an ordinary fallible lawyer.” Commonwealth v. Saferian, 366 Mass. 89, 96 (1974).

The further question for us, however, is whether, notwithstanding the actual performance of the defendant’s counsel at trial, the defendant has made “some showing that better work might have accomplished something material for the defense.” Commonwealth…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. LatimoreMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1979
  2. Commonwealth v. SaferianMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1974
  3. Commonwealth v. SatterfieldMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1977
  4. Commonwealth v. AdamsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1978
  5. Commonwealth v. FancyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1965

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. AdamidesMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1994
  2. Commonwealth v. DiGeronimoMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1995
  3. Commonwealth v. SepheusMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2014
  4. Commonwealth v. StovallMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1986
  5. Commonwealth v. BrookinsMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1992

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API