Legal Opinion
Commonwealth v. Fancy
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided May 4, 1965PublishedCited by 199 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSpalding, J.
I. The Fancy and Maloney Indictments.
Arthur A. Fancy and William F. Maloney, together with three other defendants (with whom we are not here concerned) were indicted for the larceny on May 15, 1963, of 835 cases of liquor. 1 Fancy and Maloney were also indicted with the other defendants for conspiracy to commit larceny. The jury returned verdicts of guilty under the larceny and conspiracy indictments. 2 Fancy and Maloney (defendants) were sentenced on both indictments. In accordance with G. L. c. 278, §§ 33A-33G, they have appealed, assigning as error the denial of their motions to suppress,…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Escobedo v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Nardone v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Commonwealth v. SlavskiMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1923
- Commonwealth v. MillenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
- Commonwealth v. O'BrienMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1940
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by199 opinions
- Commonwealth v. LatimoreMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1979
- Commonwealth v. CasaleMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1980
- Commonwealth v. Beneficial Finance CompanyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1971
- Commonwealth v. KelleyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1976
- Commonwealth v. AntobenedettoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1974
194 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.