Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Stovall

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided October 3, 1986PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFine, J.

The defendant, who acted as his own attorney at his trial before a jury of six in a District Court, appeals his conviction of larceny by false pretenses. He claims that his waiver of counsel was involuntary, that the Commonwealth’s case was based on substantial amounts of inadmissible hearsay evidence and was insufficient to justify the conviction, that the admission of hearsay evidence subjected him to unfair prejudice, and that the judge’s instructions to the jury were erroneous. None of the issues sought to be raised on appeal was adequately preserved in the trial court. Accordingly, we…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Commonwealth v. FreemanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1967
  3. Commonwealth v. GreenbergMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1959
  4. Commonwealth v. CoeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1874
  5. Commonwealth v. TuittMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1985

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. ConefreyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1991
  2. Commonwealth v. Duddie Ford, Inc.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1990
  3. Commonwealth v. LewisMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1999
  4. Commonwealth v. MyersMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2001
  5. Commonwealth v. PimentalMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2002

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API