Legal Opinion

Pee Dee Stores, Inc. v. Doyle

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided January 29, 2009No. 4467PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGeathers, J.

Appellant Billy W. Huggins, d/b/a Huggins Farm Service (Huggins), seeks review of an order granting Pee Dee Stores, Inc.’s (Pee Dee Stores) summary judgment motion and motion to compel settlement based on a Settlement Agreement. Huggins asserts that the Settlement Agreement was intended to resolve only the landlord/tenant claims and that his civil conspiracy and unfair trade practices claims against both Pee Dee Stores and Third-Party Defendant Helena Chemical Company (Helena) survived the Settlement Agreement. As such, Huggins alleges that summary judgment was improper because a genuine…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Futch v. McAllister Towing of Georgetown, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1999
  2. Tupper v. Dorchester CountySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1997
  3. George v. FabriSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2001
  4. South Carolina Department of Natural Resources v. Town of McClellanvilleSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2001
  5. Gilliland v. Elmwood PropertiesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1990

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Coastalstates Bank v. Hanover Homes of South Carolina, LLCCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2014
  2. Davis v. KB HOME OF SOUTH CAROLINA, INC.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 2011
  3. Lewis v. Omni Indemnity Co.District Court, D. South Carolina · 2013
  4. Byrd v. LivingstonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2012
  5. Matsell v. Crowfield Plantation Community Services Ass'nCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2011

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API