Legal Opinion

People v. Harvath

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 15, 1967No. Crim. 12312, 13515PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKingsley, J.

The present ease comes before us in the form of two attempted appeals from orders of the superior court, denying requests for relief from assertedly void orders theretofore entered. By stipulation, we treat all of the documents filed herein in both appeals as a petition for a writ of habeas corpus 1 and, for the reasons hereinafter stated, grant relief.

Defendant was charged in two counts with violation of section 288 of the Penal Code, the victim in each case being under the age of 14 years. He pied not guilty, trial by jury was duly waived, and by stipulation, the case was submitted on the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Specht v. PattersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Lewis v. Manufacturers National Bank of DetroitSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  3. People v. FullerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
  4. People v. LoignonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. In re BevillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  2. People v. SluttsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
  3. In Re KramerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
  4. People v. McMillanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
  5. People v. HarvathCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API