Legal Opinion

People v. Slutts

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 11, 1968No. Crim. 13833PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMoss, J.

Defendant was adjudged guilty after trial to the court of indecent exposure with a prior conviction of the same offense, a felony under section 314, subdivision 1 of the Penal Code. Criminal proceedings were suspended and defendant was committed to Atascadero State Hospital for observation and diagnosis as a probable mentally disordered sex offender. Upon his return from the hospital he was sentenced to state prison. He appeals from the judgment.

The principal questions raised by this appeal are: (1) whether the technique employed by the police in securing the identification of defendant…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. United States v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Stovall v. DennoSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  4. People v. DaughertyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
  5. People v. FeggansCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. People v. OchoaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
  2. People v. FeagleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  3. State v. GoldSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
  4. United States v. Hugh R. Conway, George M. Lebosky, Robert Davidoff, Hugh R. Conway, in No. 17,369, George M. Lebosky, in No. 17,391Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1969
  5. People v. HuntCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API