Legal Opinion

Lawrence v. Goord

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided January 17, 2001No. 99-0202PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Per curiam

Robert A. Lawrence, pro se, sued a number of corrections officers and other prison officials pursuant to 42 U.S.C. §§ 1983, 1985 and 1986. He alleged defendants violated his constitutional rights by issuing a series of misbehavior tickets in retaliation for his complaints to prison authorities regarding defendants’ conduct. However, Lawrence did not file a grievance with prison officials regarding the retaliatory conduct. The district court dismissed Lawrence’s complaint for failure to exhaust his administrative remedies as required by 42 U.S.C. § 1997e(a). Because we conclude the exhaustion…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Heck v. HumphreySupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  2. Hudson v. McMillianSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  3. Patsy v. Board of Regents of Fla.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. Timothy Booth v. Churner, C.O. Workensher, Sgt. Rikus, Lt. W. Gardner, CaptCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000
  5. Doe v. PfrommerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Terrence Smith v. Robert Zachary, James P. Nickerson, Lieutenant, Herman S. Nelson, Graciano Arroyo, James A. PhillipsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2001
  2. Giano v. GoordCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2001
  3. Giano v. GoordCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2004
  4. Michael Witzke v. Michelle Femal, Daniel Benzer, Jim WebbCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2004
  5. Baskerville v. BlotDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2002

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API