Legal Opinion
Fjord v. Amr Corp. (In re Amr Corp.)
United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York
Decided February 26, 2019No. Case No. 11-15463 (SHL) (Jointly Administered); Adv. Proc. No. 13-01392 (SHL)Published
1Opinion of the Court
Sean H. Lane, UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY JUDGE
*488Before the Court is Plaintiffs' Motion for Leave to File a Second Amended and Supplemental Complaint to Allege Injury and Damages Under Section 4 of the Clayton Act and Demand for Jury Trial ( Fed. R. Civ. P. 15 and Bankruptcy Rule 7015) (the "Motion") [Adv. Proc. ECF No. 189] and Memorandum of Law in Support of Plaintiffs' Motion (the "Memo of Law") [Adv. Proc. ECF No. 190]. The Motion requests that the Court grant leave to file a second amended and supplemental complaint to add a claim for treble damages and a demand for a jury trial.
BACKGROUND
The…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Zahra v. Town Of SoutholdCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
- Krumme v. Westpoint Stevens Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
- Tronox Inc. v. Kerr McGee Corp. (In re Tronox Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 2013
- H.L. Hayden Co. of New York, Inc. v. Siemens Medical Systems, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1986
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.