Amber J.F. v. Richard B.
Court of Appeals of Wisconsin
1Opinion of the CourtRoggensack, J.
Richard B. appeals an order reinstating a paternity action filed against him by Amber J.F. Richard asserts that res judicata and collateral estoppel 1 bar Amber's action, because an earlier paternity action brought by Amber's mother, Lynn M., resulted in a jury finding that Richard was not Amber's father. However, because Amber was not a party to, nor in privity with the petitioner in, the earlier action, we conclude that claim preclusion does not apply. We also conclude that policies of fundamental fairness and due process proscribe the application of issue preclusion; therefore, we affirm…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Parklane Hosiery Co. v. ShoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Blonder-Tongue Laboratories, Inc. v. University of Illinois FoundationSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Northern States Power Co. v. BugherWisconsin Supreme Court · 1995
- Michelle T. Ex Rel. Sumpter v. CrozierWisconsin Supreme Court · 1993
- Charles PURTER, Appellant, v. Margaret HECKLER, Secretary Dept. of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Estate of Rille Ex Rel. Rille v. Physicians Insurance Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2007
- Pasko v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 2002
- Robinson v. City of West AllisWisconsin Supreme Court · 2000
- Ambrose v. Continental Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1997
- DELONEY BY AND THROUGH DELONEY v. DowneySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1997
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.