Legal Opinion
Michelle T. Ex Rel. Sumpter v. Crozier
Wisconsin Supreme Court
Decided February 18, 1993No. 91-0054PublishedCited by 148 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HEFFERNAN, CHIEF JUSTICE.
This is an appeal on certification from the court of appeals from a judgment of the circuit court for Kenosha County, Barbara A. Kluka, Judge, which awarded damages to Michelle T., a minor, for injuries resulting from Cecil Crozier's sexual assault upon her.
In the course of the trial, Judge Kluka precluded defendant Crozier's offer of evidence that he had not assaulted Michelle T., because Judge Kluka found that issue had been litigated and decided adversely to Crozier in a prior criminal trial arising out of the same incident which resulted in a verdict finding him…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Parklane Hosiery Co. v. ShoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Blonder-Tongue Laboratories, Inc. v. University of Illinois FoundationSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Lawlor v. National Screen Service Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
- Good Health Dairy Products Corp. v. EmeryNew York Court of Appeals · 1937
- State Ex Rel. Flowers v. Department of Health & Social ServicesWisconsin Supreme Court · 1978
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by148 opinions
- Northern States Power Co. v. BugherWisconsin Supreme Court · 1995
- First Weber Group, Incorporate v. Jonathan HorsfallCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2013
- Paige K. B. v. Steven G. B.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1999
- Lindas v. CadyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1994
- Michelle Gilbank v. Wood County Department of Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2024
143 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.