Legal Opinion

Hull v. Heritage Mutual Insurance

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided July 24, 1996No. 95-2423PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSnyder, J.

Heritage Mutual Insurance Company appeals from a judgment which ordered the company to pay William Hull $50,000 in underinsured motorist (UIM) benefits for injuries Hull sustained when the vehicle he was driving lost a rear wheel and overturned. Heritage contends that Hull voided his claim for UIM benefits when he settled with American Racing Equipment, Inc. (the manufacturer of the wheel) and Wheel and Tire Shop, Inc. (the retailer) without notifying Heritage. Because we conclude that under its UIM policy language Heritage has no subro-gation rights against any potential tortfeasor who is…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Pierringer v. HogerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Vogt v. SchroederWisconsin Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Welch v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Sprangers v. Greatway Insurance Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Schulte v. FrazinWisconsin Supreme Court · 1993

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. GilletteWisconsin Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Pitts v. Revocable Trust of KnueppelWisconsin Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Mordesovitch v. Westfield InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. West Virginia · 2003
  4. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. GilletteWisconsin Supreme Court · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API