Legal Opinion

Savings Bank v. National Bank

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided March 8, 1897PublishedCited by 14 opinions

PROM DAVIDSON. Appeal from Chancery Court of Davidson County. Thos. H. Malone, Ch.

1Opinion of the CourtBeard', J.

' This" cause: was'"tried'' upon a state*338ment of agreed facts. ■ Those essential to its present determination are as follows, to wit:

The complainant and defendant were corporations engaged in general banking operations — the one in Birmingham, Alabama, and the other in Nashville, in this State. They were, at the time of the transaction out of which this controversy arose, and had been for a considerable period antecedent, engaged in mutual correspondence, as the exigencies of their business required or suggested. In the course of this correspondence the complainant bank, as owner and holder,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Sahlien v. BankTennessee Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Howard & Co. v. WalkerTennessee Supreme Court · 1893

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Sherman v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1911
  2. Pennsylvania Railroad v. NaiveTennessee Supreme Court · 1903
  3. Kershaw v. LaddOregon Supreme Court · 1899
  4. Spokane Valley State Bank v. LutesWashington Supreme Court · 1925
  5. San Francisco National Bank v. American National Bank of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1907

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API