Legal Opinion
Paul Rhodes v. Clarence A. H. Meyer, Paul Rhodes v. Richard M. Van Steenberg
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided November 16, 1964No. 17580, 17588PublishedCited by 85 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
VAN OOSTERHOUT, Circuit Judge.
Plaintiff Paul E. Rhodes appeals from final judgment dismissing his complaint in each of these cases as to all defendants upon motions to dismiss filed by defend ants. These cases were heard separately below. They were argued together here. We will deal with both cases in this opinion as many of the parties and issues are common and the disposition of both cases is controlled by the same underlying principles. Case No. 17,580 (No. 01682 below) will be referred to as Meyer. Case No. 17,588 (No. 01784 below) will be referred to as Van Steenberg.
Plaintiff’s causes…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Monroe v. PapeSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Sanders v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Baltimore Steamship Co. v. PhillipsSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Paul Rodger Weller v. Fred H. Dickson, Andrew Emmitte Pope v. Richard A. McGeeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1963
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. ErricoSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by85 opinions
- Preiser v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- William J. Bauers, Jr. v. Herbert T. Heisel, JrCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1966
- Neal Clark v. State of Washington, and Washington State Bar Association, an Agency of State Government, the State Bar of California, Amicus CuriaeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1966
- Milton McCray v. State of MarylandCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1972
- Bennett v. GravelleDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1971
80 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.