Legal Opinion
Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Errico
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided January 16, 1967No. 54PublishedCited by 209 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Warren
We granted certiorari in these cases to resolve a conflict between the Second and Ninth Circuits on their interpretations of § 241 (f) of the Immigration and *215Nationality Act.1 The issue is identical in both cases and, therefore, lends itself to a single opinion.
Section 241 (f) reads as follows:
“The provisions of this section relating to the deportation of aliens within the United States on the ground that they were excludable at the time of entry as aliens who have sought to procure, or have procured visas or other documentation, or entry into the United States by fraud or misrepresentation…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Fong Haw Tan v. PhelanSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Delgadillo v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Barber v. GonzalesSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- Giuseppe Errico v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1965
- Muriel May Scott, Nee Plummer v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1965
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by209 opinions
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Cardoza-FonsecaSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- McDonald v. Santa Fe Trail Transportation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Yueh-Shaio YangSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Rolando Augustine Castellano-Chacon v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003
- Hakim Iddir v. Immigration And Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2002
204 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.