Witmer v. Exxon Corp.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
HOFFMAN, Judge:
These are seven similar cases brought by various service station franchisees against their common franchisor, Exxon Corporation (Exxon) to enjoin Exxon from collecting increases in service station rentals, to compel Exxon to return all collected rent increases, and to negotiate in good faith *542with the franchisees (appellants) to set mutually agreeable rentals. In each case, the lower court sustained Exxon’s demurrer, and dismissed appellant’s complaints. It is from these orders that appellants now appeal. We affirm.
The facts of each of the seven cases, here consolidated on…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Atlantic Richfield Co. v. RazumicSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
- Riley v. Boynton Coal Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
- Hunter v. StraubeOregon Supreme Court · 1975
- Pittsburgh v. Charles Zubik & Sons, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1961
- Routman v. BohmSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1961
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- Witmer v. Exxon Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
- Commonwealth v. BaileySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
- Grimme Combustion, Inc. v. Mergentime Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
- In re TD Bank, N.A.District Court, D. South Carolina · 2015
- Commonwealth v. LippincottSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2019
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.