Collins v. Chappell
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
BLACKBIRD, Justice.
This appeal involves the right of defendant in error, Chappell, the admitted owner of the surface and reversionary mineral rights in and under a 40-acre tract of land, to recover certain impounded proceeds from the sale of oil from producing wells thereon, and to have his title to the entire fee simple estate in said land quieted against plaintiff in error. For an understanding of the situation out of which the controversy arose, certain historical facts concerning it should be related. |
In March of 1908, one Harry Wright, as trustee for certain other parties, executed and…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Telford v. FrostWisconsin Supreme Court · 1890
- Peterson v. BettsWashington Supreme Court · 1946
- Papoose Oil Co. v. SwindlerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
- Douglas v. SchindlerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
- Ferguson v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1932
3Cited by5 opinions
- Fane Development Company v. TownsendSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1963
- CLAUDE C. ARNOLD NON-OPERATED ROYALTY INTEREST PROPERTIES v. CABOT OIL & GAS CORP.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2021
- CLAUDE C. ARNOLD NON-OPERATED ROYALTY INTEREST PROPERTIES v. CABOT OIL & GAS CORP.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2021
- Kenai Landing, Inc. v. Cook Inlet Natural Gas Storage Alaska, LLCAlaska Supreme Court · 2019
- Leiper v. GallegosCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2019