Legal Opinion

Douglas v. Schindler

California Supreme Court

Decided June 19, 1930No. Docket No. Sac. 4300PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THE COURT.

This appeal presents but one point for our consideration, namely: Did a certain agreement to be hereafter set forth, amount to a novation, thereby releasing respondent Schindler from liability under a certain lease agreement, or was it a mere recording agreement, in no way changing the legal status of the parties at the time of its execution. The point arises from the following uncontradicted facts:

On August 10, 1922, Austie L. Douglas and H. J. Douglas, as lessors, entered into a lease agreement with A. D. Schindler as lessee, for the leasing of some 2,400 acres of land in Kings…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Welcome v. HessCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Bangle v. SouthwellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Colt Lanes of Dover, Inc. v. Brunswick CorporationSupreme Court of Delaware · 1971
  2. Collins v. ChappellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1958
  3. Security-First National Bank v. MarxenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
  4. Ferguson v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API