State ex rel. Martinez v. Parker Townsend Ranch Co.
New Mexico Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MINZNER, Judge.
On the state’s motion for rehearing, the prior opinion filed September 14, 1992 is withdrawn and the following is substituted therefor.
The state appeals from the district court’s order granting defendant water rights holders’ motion for summary judgment and denying the state’s similar motion. On appeal, the state contends that the district court erred in granting defendants’ motion for summary judgment, because the basis for the court’s decision was a subfile order in defendants’ favor, which should have been viewed as modifiable. We affirm on the ground that defendants…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Kelly Inn No. 102, Inc. v. KapnisonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1992
- Koenig v. PerezNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1986
- Templeton v. Pecos Valley Artesian Conservancy DistrictNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1958
- State Ex Rel. Reynolds v. MendenhallNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1961
- Koppenhaver v. KoppenhaverNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1984
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- State Ex Rel. State Engineer v. Parker Townsend Ranch Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1994
- Sacramento Grazing Ass'n v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2010
- State ex rel. Office of the State Engineer v. Elephant Butte Irrigation DistrictNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2012
- Sacramento Grazing Association, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2017
- State ex rel. Office of State Eng'r v. Elephant Butte Irrigation Dist.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 2012