Siegel v. Warner Bros. Entertainment Inc.
District Court, C.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER RESOLVING ADDITIONAL ISSUES
STEPHEN G. LARSON, District Judge.
The 1976 Copyright Act contains many intricate formalities that an author (or his or her heirs) must navigate to successfully terminate the grant to the copyright in an original work of authorship, but perhaps none is more fundamental an impediment than the one excluding from the reach of termination the copyright “in a work made for hire.” 17 U.S.C. § 304(c); see 1 Melville B. Nimmer, Nimmer on Copyright § 5.03[A] at 5-12 (2008) (commenting that the exclusion “relating to termination of transfers is probably the most…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Sony Corp. of America v. Universal City Studios, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Ashley Hunt Greenwood v. Federal Aviation AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- Warren v. Fox Family Worldwide, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Nichols v. Universal Pictures CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1930
- National Comics Publications, Inc. v. Fawcett Publications, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1951
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- TufAmerica, Inc. v. Codigo Music LLCDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2016
- Marvel Worldwide, Inc. v. KirbyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2011
- Horror Inc. v. MillerDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2018
- TCA Television Corp. v. McCollumDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2015
- Siegel v. WARNER BROS. ENTERTAINMENT INC.District Court, C.D. California · 2009
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.