Legal Opinion

Thompson v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 21, 2002PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

Judge LEADBETTER.

This case is before us on remand from our Supreme Court. We are now called upon to address an issue which we did not reach during our initial consideration of the case, to wit, whether an employer which has paid workers’ compensation benefits has subrogation rights in a third party tort recovery even though the employee and tortfeasor have designated the settlement funds as solely attributable to pain and suffering. The history of this case has been set forth at length by Justice Castille in the opinion of the court, Thompson v. Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board.…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Thompson v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
  2. Dale Manufacturing Co. v. BressiSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  3. Darr Construction Co. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
  4. Winfree v. Philadelphia Electric Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  5. Bumbarger v. BUMBARGERSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1959

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Gillette v. WurstSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  2. City of Pittsburgh v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  3. Serrano v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
  4. Martino v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  5. MARTION v. WCAB (Peco Energy)Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2002

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API