Martino v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
*946OPINION BY
Judge LEADBETTER.
This appeal presents the issue of whether employer is' entitled under Section 319 of the Workers’ Compensation Act,1 as amended, 77 P.S. § 671, to assert its sub-rogation lien against claimant’s entire third-party recovery where there has not been a determination or adjudication regarding the amount of recovery attributable to the spouse’s loss of consortium claim. The Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board (Board) concluded that employer was entitled to subrogate against the entire third-party recovery and affirmed the grant of employer’s suspension petition.
The facts…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- La Vale Plaza, Inc., a New York Corporation v. R. S. Noonan, Inc., a Pennsylvania CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1967
- Thompson v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
- Darr Construction Co. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
- Dasconio v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
- Pendleton v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Symons v. Schuylkill County Vocational School, I.U. 29Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
- Pool v. Morristown Memorial Hosp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2008
- MARTION v. WCAB (Peco Energy)Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2002