Legal Opinion

City of Pittsburgh v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 19, 2002PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

Judge SIMPSON.

The Pittsburgh City Police Department (Employer) petitions this Court for review 1 of the decision of the Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board (Board) affirming the determination of the Workers’ Compensation Judge (WCJ). Contrary to the Board, we hold that Employer did not illegally terminate Anthony Williams’ (Claimant) benefits under the Heart and Lung Act, 2 and that Employer is entitled to a subrogation interest in Claimant’s third-party settlement.

Claimant, hired by Employer as a police officer in 1989, was injured in a work-related car collision in February 1994…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Creighan v. PittsburghSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
  2. Thompson v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
  3. Callahan v. Pennsylvania State PoliceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  4. Bumbarger v. BUMBARGERSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
  5. Fulmer v. Com., Pennsylvania State PoliceCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1994

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Oliver v. City of PittsburghSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
  2. Stermel v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  3. Oliver v. City of PittsburghCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
  4. City of Philadelphia v. F. ZampognaCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
  5. City of Wilkes-Barre v. SheilsDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2008

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API