Opalenik v. LaBrie
District Court, D. Massachusetts
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER WITH REGARD TO DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (Document Nos. 81 and 88)
KENNETH P. NEIMAN, United States Magistrate Judge.
Steven Opalenik and Diane Opalenik (“Plaintiffs”), proceeding pro se, assert various civil rights and tort claims against the Town of Hadley and certain Hadley police officers (“Hadley Defendants”) as well as against the Town of South Hadley and certain South Hadley- police officers (“South Hadley Defendants”). The individual Hadley Defendants are David S. Bertera, Adam J. Bartlett, Mark Shlosser, Barry O’Connor and Dennis Hukowiez.1 The…
2Cases cited73 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Pearson v. CallahanSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Anderson v. CreightonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
68 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- McGrath v. Town of SandwichDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2014
- Aaron v. City of LowellDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2023
- Bassett v. JensenDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2020
- Echavarria v. RoachDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2021
- Jolene Mercadante and Cheryl Kowalski v. Town of Agawam, Nancy Siegel, Christopher Johnson and William SapelliDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2025
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.