Legal Opinion

Welborne v. Downing

Texas Supreme Court

Decided April 19, 1889No. 6199PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal from Olay. Tried below before Hon. B. F. Williams.

1Opinion of the Court

Henry, Associate Justice.—

Mary B. Welborne claims title to the land in controversy as a purchaser at forced sale.

The defendant, John Downing, Sr., claims that it was his homestead, and as such exempt from forced sale at the date of the levy and sale.

Downing with his wife and four minor children having resided on the premises for several years before, he, in the year 1884, with his wife and two of the children went to Montana Territory and remained there until the levy and sale were made, after which he returned and again resided on the place for a short time, when he sold it and returned to…

2Cited by9 opinions

  1. Miller-Vidor Lumber Co. v. SchreiberCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1927
  2. Medearis v. BurattiCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1925
  3. Arp v. JacobsWyoming Supreme Court · 1891
  4. Ritz v. First Nat. Bank of PecosCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1921
  5. Rockwell Bros. Co. v. HudgensCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1909

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API