Legal Opinion

Ritz v. First Nat. Bank of Pecos

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided October 27, 1921No. 1241PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal from District Court, Reeves County ; Chas. Gibbs, Judge. Suit by the First National Bank of Pecos against Max Ritz, wherein a writ of attachment was levied upon land, which defendant’s wife, in a cross-action joined by her husband, claimed to be homestead. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendants appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtHiggins, J.

Appellee on September 3, 1921, brought this suit against Max Ritz to recover upon a promissory note in its favor executed by him.

Upon the filing of the petition the plaintiff applied for a writ of attachment upon the ground that Ritz was a nonresident. The writ was issued and levied upon certain premises in the town of Pecos.

Ritz answered, admitting that the bank was entitled to Judgment against him upon the note.

By cross-action Mrs. Ritz, joined by her husband, set up that the property levied upon under the writ was their homestead and had never been abandoned by them, that the writ had been…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Wynne v. HudsonTexas Supreme Court · 1886
  2. Gouhenant v. CockrellTexas Supreme Court · 1857
  3. Hudgins v. ThompsonTexas Supreme Court · 1919
  4. Cross v. EvertsTexas Supreme Court · 1866
  5. Shepherd v. CassidayTexas Supreme Court · 1857

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Hill v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1972
  2. Good v. GoodCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1927
  3. McFarland v. Rousseau, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1984
  4. City Nat. Bank of Bryan v. WalkerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1937
  5. Carstens v. LandrumCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1928

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API