Jackson v. Tate
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SILVERMAN, Circuit Judge:
We hold today that the Feres doctrine does not bar a discharged serviceman, who remains in the Individual Ready Reserve, from suing active duty National Guard recruiters whom he accuses of forging his signature on re-enlistment papers. Feres does not apply because the alleged injury is not “incident to” the plaintiffs service; indeed, the tortious conduct complained of allegedly occurred as a predicate to agreeing to a new service obligation, unrelated to any benefit or duty connected to any service obligation he has already incurred. We also hold that the two…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Feres v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Osborn v. HaleySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- United States v. ShearerSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Brooks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- White v. Social Security AdministrationDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2015
- Luke West v. Carrie RiethCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2017
- Heap v. CarterDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2015
- Karlene Gilmore v. State of MississippiCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2018
- Bunyan v. United States of America, Department of Veteran AffairsDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 2019
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.