Legal Opinion

Jackson v. Tate

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided June 2, 2011No. 10-35355PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SILVERMAN, Circuit Judge:

We hold today that the Feres doctrine does not bar a discharged serviceman, who remains in the Individual Ready Reserve, from suing active duty National Guard recruiters whom he accuses of forging his signature on re-enlistment papers. Feres does not apply because the alleged injury is not “incident to” the plaintiffs service; indeed, the tortious conduct complained of allegedly occurred as a predicate to agreeing to a new service obligation, unrelated to any benefit or duty connected to any service obligation he has already incurred. We also hold that the two…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Feres v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
  3. Osborn v. HaleySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  4. United States v. ShearerSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. Brooks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. White v. Social Security AdministrationDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2015
  2. Luke West v. Carrie RiethCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2017
  3. Heap v. CarterDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2015
  4. Karlene Gilmore v. State of MississippiCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2018
  5. Bunyan v. United States of America, Department of Veteran AffairsDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 2019

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API