Med. Acquisition Co. v. Superior Court of San Diego Cnty.
California Court of Appeal, 5th District
1Opinion of the CourtHuffman, Acting P. J.
*318This eminent domain case presents a novel issue regarding a defendant's postjudgment withdrawal of an increased deposit made by the condemning agency. Below, the condemning agency, Tri-City Healthcare District (Tri-City), made a pretrial deposit of $4.7 million and sought to take immediate possession of the subject *656property, a partially completed medical building. Medical Acquisition Company, Inc. (MAC) stipulated to Tri-City's possession of the building and withdrew the $4.7 *319million deposited under the "quick-take" provision of the California Constitution (see Cal. Const., art. I, § 19,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Tobe v. City of Santa AnaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
- Shamblin v. BrattainCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
- Guardianship of Ann S.California Supreme Court · 2009
- Mt. San Jacinto Community College District v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2007
- Escondido Union School District v. Casa Sueños De Oro, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2005
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Robinson v. Super. Ct.California Court of Appeal · 2023
- Untitled California Attorney General Opinion, California Attorney General Reports2018