Legal Opinion

Med. Acquisition Co. v. Superior Court of San Diego Cnty.

California Court of Appeal, 5th District

Decided January 11, 2018No. D072509PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHuffman, Acting P. J.

*318This eminent domain case presents a novel issue regarding a defendant's postjudgment withdrawal of an increased deposit made by the condemning agency. Below, the condemning agency, Tri-City Healthcare District (Tri-City), made a pretrial deposit of $4.7 million and sought to take immediate possession of the subject *656property, a partially completed medical building. Medical Acquisition Company, Inc. (MAC) stipulated to Tri-City's possession of the building and withdrew the $4.7 *319million deposited under the "quick-take" provision of the California Constitution (see Cal. Const., art. I, § 19,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Tobe v. City of Santa AnaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Shamblin v. BrattainCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Guardianship of Ann S.California Supreme Court · 2009
  4. Mt. San Jacinto Community College District v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2007
  5. Escondido Union School District v. Casa Sueños De Oro, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2005

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Robinson v. Super. Ct.California Court of Appeal · 2023
  2. Untitled California Attorney General Opinion, California Attorney General Reports2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API