Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Robinson v. Super. Ct.

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 3, 2023No. F085211Published

1Opinion of the Court

Filed 3/2/23 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT CLYDE DAVID ROBINSON et al., Petitioner, F085211 v. (Super. Ct. No. BCV-22-101535-JEB) THE SUPERIOR COURT OF KERN COUNTY, OPINION Respondent; SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY, Real Party in Interest. ORIGINAL PROCEEDINGS; petition for writ of mandate. Eric Bradshaw, Judge. Schwartz Law and Jeffrey M. Schwartz for Petitioner. No appearance for Respondent. Nossaman, Bradford B. Kuhn and Steven M. Silva for Real Party in Interest. -ooOoo- Southern California Edison Company…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Denham v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  2. Palma v. U.S. Industrial Fasteners, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Pineda v. Bank of America, N.A.California Supreme Court · 2010
  4. Jennings v. Palomar Pomerado Health Systems, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2003
  5. Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority v. Alameda Produce Market, LLCCalifornia Supreme Court · 2011

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API