Professional Product Research Inc. v. General Star Indemnity Co.
District Court, S.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION AND ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT, GRANTING DEFENDANT’S CROSS-MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT, AND DECLARING THAT DEFENDANT HAS NO DUTY TO DEFEND/INDEMNIFY
McMAHON, District Judge:
This action seeking a declaratory judgment that an insurer has a duty to defend plaintiff in an underlying action has its genesis in an action pending in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee. The action involves intellectual property torts. It was commenced in 1999, by a company known as E-Z Bowz (EZB), against plaintiff Professional…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- John C. Donahue v. Windsor Locks Board of Fire Commissioners, John R. Colli, Jr., Russell C. Gabrielson, and John R. Colli, IIICourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1987
- Security Mutual Insurance v. Acker-Fitzsimons Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1972
- White v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1993
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Rockland Exposition, Inc. v. Great American Assurance Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 2010
- Gelfman v. Capitol Indemnity Corp.District Court, E.D. New York · 2014
- Frankenmuth Mutual Insurance Company v. The Hockey Cup LLCDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2019